体外物理振动排石对不同体重指数无症状肾小结石主动排石的疗效分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Effect of external physical vibration lithecbole for asymptomatic small renal calculi with different body mass index
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    目的 探讨体外物理振动排石(EPVL)对不同体重指数(BMI)无症状肾小结石主动排石效果的影响。方法 回顾性分析2019年1月至2020年10月在临沂市中心医院收治的155例无症状肾小结石患者,根据BMI标准将患者分为三组,正常组(56例,18.5 kg/m2≤BMI≤23.9 kg/m2)、超重组(65例,24 kg/m2≤BMI≤27.9 kg/m2)、肥胖组(34例,BMI≥28 kg/m2)。分析EPVL对不同BMI无症状肾小结石患者当日结石排出率(SER)以及1、2周结石排净率(SFR)的影响;探讨不同患者对EPVL的满意度及分析相关并发症。结果 不同BMI患者对(首次主动排石治疗体验、排石当日见结石、排石治疗与期望及总体治疗)EPVL治疗的满意度高,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。正常组的当日SER、1周SFR、2周SFR高于超重组、肥胖组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。肥胖组中皮肤过敏、眩晕等并发症发生率较高,组间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 EPVL是一种安全有效的辅助排石治疗方式,其SER与SFR较高;不同BMI可影响EPVL效果,非肥胖患者的EPVL效果优于肥胖患者。

    Abstract:

    Objective To evaluate the effect of different body mass index(BMI)on external physical vibration lithecbole(EPVL)for the asymptomatic small renal calculi.Methods A retrospective analysis of 155 asymptomatic patients with small renal calculi admitted to Linyi central hospital from January 2019 to October 2020 was performed.Patients were divided into three groups according to BMI criteria, normal physique group(18.5 kg/m2≤BMI≤23.9 kg/m2, 56 cases),overweight physique group(24 kg/m2≤BMI≤27.9 kg/m2,65 cases),obesity physique group(BMI≥28 kg/m2,34 cases). The effects of EPVL on daily stone excretion rate (SER) and stone excretion rate (SFR) at 1 and 2 weeks in patients with different BMI were analyzed. The satisfaction of different patients with active physical vibration stone removal was explored and analyze the related complications was analyzed.Results Patients with different BMI had high satisfaction with EPVL treatment (first experience of active stone discharge treatment, stone on the day of stone discharge, stone discharge treatment and expectation, and overall treatment), and there was no significant difference among the three groups (all P>0.05).Daily SER, 1 week SFR and 2 week SFR in the normal group were higher than those in the overweight and obesity groups, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). The incidence of complications such as skin allergy and vertigo was higher in the obesity group, and there was no statistical significance between the two groups (all P>0.05).Conclusions EPVL is a safe and effective auxiliary stone removal treatment, which has a high stone discharge rate and clearance rate. Different BMI can affect the stone removal effect of physical vibration in vitro, and non obese patients have better stone removal effect than obese patients.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献

引用格式: 刘皎林,王鑫,徐英民,阮同德,齐强元,袁令兴.体外物理振动排石对不同体重指数无症状肾小结石主动排石的疗效分析[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2022,(5):773-777.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: